Uncover critical statistics about Privileged Access Management (PAM) that highlight the financial and security risks of inadequate access control and the importance of mature PAM strategies for organizations.

July 1, 2019 8:39:01 PM EDT | Blog 6 Key Stats on Privileged Access Management (PAM) and Why They Matter

Discover critical Privileged Access Management (PAM) statistics and the urgent need for strategies to safeguard against data breaches and insider threats.

The Essential Statistics on Privileged Access Management (PAM) You Need to Know

Privileged Access Management (PAM) is a critical component of cybersecurity, focusing on the management, monitoring, and control of privileged user access and activities. Despite its importance, many organizations struggle with effectively implementing PAM strategies due to complex IT infrastructures, regulatory demands, and technology sprawl. Understanding key statistics can illuminate the path to robust PAM governance and underscore the stakes involved in securing privileged access.

1. PAM Maturity and Breach Incidence

According to Forrester's "Stop the Breach" report, 83% of organizations lack a mature approach to access management, resulting in twice as many breaches. This statistic highlights the direct correlation between PAM maturity and the risk of data breaches. It underscores the necessity for sophisticated access management strategies to mitigate internal threats and reduce associated costs.

2. Financial Impact of Breaches on US Enterprises

Data breaches cost US enterprises an average of $7.91 million per incident, nearly double the global average, as reported by IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report . This significant financial impact is driven by factors such as client loss, breach magnitude, and the costs associated with containment, detection, and escalation. Effective PAM strategies are essential to prevent such costly incidents.

3. Breach Discovery and Containment

The Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report indicates that 56% of breaches take months or longer to discover . This prolonged detection and containment period exacerbates financial and reputational damage, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to identify and address vulnerabilities promptly.

4. Privileged User Access Policies

According to the Ponemon Institute, 49% of organizations do not have explicit policies for privileged user access . The absence of clear governance around access management points to potential risks arising from inadequate visibility and control, often relying on manual, error-prone processes.

5. Role of Compromised Privileged Credentials

Forrester reports that 80% of security breaches involve compromised privileged credentials . This statistic highlights the critical need for stringent management and monitoring of administrative roles to limit data and IT asset exposure.

6. Perceived Vulnerability to Insider Attacks

A study by Crowd Research Partners reveals that 90% of organizations feel exposed to insider threats . Excessive access privileges, the proliferation of devices with data access, and IT complexity are cited as primary concerns. The response involves adopting technologies like Data Loss Prevention (DLP), encryption, and identity and access management solutions to mitigate these risks.

Bonus Stat: Reality of Password Vaulting

Despite organizations believing that 80% of their privileged access accounts are managed, actual assessments reveal a reality closer to 20% . This discrepancy underscores the limitations of password vaulting solutions and the need for comprehensive PAM strategies.

Conclusion

These statistics serve as a clarion call for organizations to reassess their PAM strategies. The complexities of privileged access management require more than just technical solutions; they demand a comprehensive approach that includes policy development, regular audits, and a culture of cybersecurity awareness. To navigate the PAM landscape effectively, partnering with experts who can offer tailored strategies and insights is invaluable.

Ready to elevate your PAM Strategy? Speak with one of our experts today
 
Rosario Mastrogiacomo

Written By: Rosario Mastrogiacomo

Rosario Mastrogiacomo is the Vice President of Engineering for SPHERE, where he focuses on solving complex security and infrastructure problems involving the processing and analysis of large data sets to find creative and out-of-box thinking solutions. Rosario has been working as a technology leader for over 25 years at financial organizations such as Neuberger Berman, Lehman Brothers, and Barclays. He has held various senior leadership positions including Global Head of Core Software Engineering, Head of Mac Platform Engineering, Global Head of Windows Engineering, and Windows Support Manager. Rosario has built and managed several teams within these positions, some with multi-million-dollar budgets. For the last eight years at SPHERE, Rosario has built the team and methodologies for the development of SPHEREboard. Rosario holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Baruch College (CUNY).